Diversify offshore, but
don’t give up on SA
South African investors are constantly bombarded with negative economic and political news flow. Allegations of state capture, corruption in government, a president who’s been described as ‘rogue’ and extreme pressure on institutions have led investors to question whether they shouldn’t perhaps give up on South Africa as an investment destination. The answer is not as clear-cut as one would imagine, however – before rushing offshore, investors need to take a step back and explore the reasons why they should be diversifying geographically. In our view, South Africa does still offer unique investment opportunities and it would be short-sighted to ship out an entire portfolio.
Download and listen to podcast while you browseListen to podcast
Investment portfolios should be diversified across different geographic regions to achieve these objectives:
- To protect investments against sovereign risks. Investors need protection against the risk that a government could default on its sovereign debt or other obligations. Finance Minister Malusi Gigaba’s Medium-Term Budget Policy Statement last month certainly raised concerns about South Africa’s ability to honour its debt obligations in future.
- To protect investments against currency risks. A structurally higher inflation rate relative to trading partners is likely to weigh on the currency over time. Also, if investors perceive that the sovereign risks of a country are high, the currency is likely to reflect this risk by weakening against cross currencies. If investors are exposed to this currency, it simply means that their investments – all things being equal – will lose value in international terms.
- To participate in investment opportunities outside the borders of investors’ country of residence, in this case, South Africa. These opportunities include:
- Taking advantage of global demographic trends
- Sharing in emerging industries not listed locally
- Investing in undervalued markets
- Diversifying company-specific risk
- Better risk-adjusted portfolio composition
Hedging against the risks
It’s for these reasons that we have advocated that our clients should migrate a portion of their assets from South Africa to offshore investment opportunities. Where our clients have given us discretion in an equity mandate to invest money offshore, we’ve proposed a direct offshore exposure of 38% with the remainder invested in South African equities.
When we consider the source of earnings of the South African equity component, however, our analysis suggests that of the 62% South African exposure, around 75% of these earnings are generated outside our country’s borders. Investors who follow this mandate therefore effectively have an 85% exposure to offshore economies and economic trends. We can thus safely argue that we’ve already hedged our clients’ portfolios against the above-mentioned risks, and at Sanlam Private Wealth we’re already participating in the global opportunity set.
Shipping it all out?
The question remains: if an investor isn’t currently in the fortunate position to have significant offshore exposure, is it now the time to invest a material proportion of an investment portfolio abroad? Also, given the current uncertain political and economic landscape, should South Africans consider investing their entire portfolio abroad?
One should of course never ask questions about timing when emotions are running high. From an investment perspective, this is easy to explain. When the environment is obviously toxic and herd instinct takes over, the news is normally already reflected in the price of assets. If an investor is incorrectly positioned at the time, it implies that to correct the position, they’ll need to sell the unpopular asset, which in all likelihood will be cheap, and buy the popular asset, which will likely be expensive. Hardly a trade that will serve the investment interests of the investor over the longer term.
This scenario was evident in 2001, when South Africans panicked after the rand rapidly lost ground against cross currencies at a time when the popular view was that South Africa was simply another Zimbabwe in the making. Not only did South African investors who followed that popular argument sell a cheap currency (the rand), they also bought expensive currencies (US dollars or British pounds). It took the currency 14 years to get back to those levels, as can be seen on this graph:
Even worse, cheap South African shares were sold to buy expensive offshore shares. And if this was the only investment decision made over this period, these investors will to this day not have caught up with what their position would have been had they have remained invested in South Africa, as this graph shows:
Is it different this time?
So is it different this time, or are investors who follow the herd instinct likely to make the same mistake they did in 2001? Focusing only on the two most crucial prices, we don’t believe the situation is entirely the same. Firstly, the rand is now not as cheap against the cross currencies compared to 2001. In fact, the rand is more or less fairly priced against the euro and the British pound at current levels. Secondly, while we believe that the South African equity market is cheaper – and we’re therefore reluctant sellers – than its international peers, the price ‘gap’ isn’t as wide as it was in 2001.
If a portfolio is very biased towards South African assets, we’ll therefore still consider migrating money offshore given the current exchange rate and prices of our equities. However, we’ll certainly not argue for a complete disinvestment from South Africa. Ignoring the jurisdiction where the liabilities vest (that is, future spending and income requirements), South Africa still offers investment opportunities that are unique and at prices that offer a justifiable future reward for investors prepared to invest in these opportunities.
There’s little doubt that investor mood is likely to fluctuate wildly as we approach the planned ANC elective conference in December. However, we’ve learnt that good value or price provides the longer-term margin of safety, rather than linear investment thinking that extrapolates current uncertainty as future gospel.
A recent case in point was the argument for selling off banks after the ‘Nenegate’ debacle, as it was ‘obvious’ that the rand would suffer following a widely held view that a credit downgrade would follow. But look what happened:
The Standard Bank share price collapsed from R140 per share in November 2015 to below R100 per share. Today, however, the share is trading at R166. So it was hardly a clever decision to get rid of a quality counter on negative news flow at R100 per share.
In a nutshell
At Sanlam Private Wealth, we manage our clients’ portfolios actively. Our investment philosophy rests on the belief that the level of prices, rather than investment sentiment, should dictate investment decisions. While we certainly don’t ignore the perspective of the investment environment, we are wary of taking radical investment decisions when emotions have already driven prices away from their fair values. Against this background, we are of the opinion that it would be inappropriate for a South African investor to invest an entire portfolio abroad. However, if an investor’s portfolio currently does not have material offshore exposure, we’d consider it prudent at the current exchange rate of R14 to the dollar to migrate a portion of assets offshore.
There are different ways of accessing the global market – at Sanlam Private Wealth we provide the full range of options, with a customised offshore solution to complement your individual investment strategy. Read more here